Author: Chessfun
Date: 03:06:54 05/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2000 at 05:01:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 11, 2000 at 01:10:51, Chessfun wrote: Didn't you just cover this in the other post. Well I guess this deserves a separate single post.? >>The 11-9 results were checked on both computers. >>The F6a evals were low compared to analysis. >>The crafty evals were fine compared to analysis. >>The crafty game scores of these were deleted since that >>machine is carrying the match scores. >>The other machine has the F6a game scores and evals and >>they still exist. > >What did you do wrong the first time then. According to records you wrote: > >"I happened to let 5/0 run through the night. >As a result it looped through and played 5/0 twice. > >In the second set of 20 games the score was: > 5 min game Fritz 6a 9.0 - 11.0 Crafty 17-10 >I am not sure what to make of it. > >All games posted have been checked and a few of the >moves checked on the opposite computer everything checks >out ok." (Apparently okay?) Correct. The moves were and are within the evals. But as can be seen it is posted as a question since I know something is wrong. It is not possible to play Nunn at given time X then replay the same way and get a difference of 15-5 - 9-11. So something must be wrong but at that point I wasn't sure what and I assumed I would receive suggestions as to what the problem could be. >or > >"As I said...in somepost not sure which. I had let it run 5/0 through >the night so it looped and played the match twice. I checked the games >from the point of view of will eng A play this move and will B make >that move. Then later after reboot I reran the test and got the same >original score." (No mention of trouble with eng A or B) Correct the moves were and are within the evals. I rebooted and played over getting the same score as the first set 15-5. >or > >"If it is on the basis of my statement above relevant to ponder=on >"I expect it to win with ponder=off or ponder=on." then the 12-8 >isn't valid as that was Jouni's score and in fact the games were >bogus as playing them a third time proved." (The rerun is supposed to prove >something?) The rerun proofed the score of the original score. >No reference to faulty games as far as I can see, except the 9-0 score later on, >when encouraged by Uri. A reference to a post, where you claim to have checked >the 11-9 result and found errors, would be appreciated. Sadly I do not post every movement I make or when I go to the stores. The moves in the 11-9 games were within F6 evals. But the depths of those moves were not as deep as they should have been given the same time for the move in analysis. This as stated elsewhere was discovered by Uri as being the case for Crafty at 25/0. It was at that point that this was discovered and since I have made no posts on the subject since that time so there is no post where it is stated. If you believe Crafty can win 5/0 Nunn 1 against F6 then have someone play the match and you will see that infact F6 wins easily. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.