Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Clarification if Cheating could be excluded from Computerchess

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 03:53:00 05/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2000 at 05:41:31, Hans Gerber wrote:

>On May 11, 2000 at 22:10:49, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On May 11, 2000 at 19:38:36, Hans Gerber wrote:
>>
>>>On May 11, 2000 at 17:37:02, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>I don't know where you will find a transcript, although I am sure such must
>>>>exist somewhere.  But most anyone present can confirm that Kasparov started
>>>>with the 'comments' after game 2.  That was when he asked for the printouts
>>>>as he was convinced something was 'wrong'...
>>>
>>>Are you sure that there had been a press conference after game two where
>>>Kasparov participated? You stated that he made public accusations about
>>>cheating.
>>
>>
>>There was a press conference after _every_ round.  That was where he asked
>>for the printouts.  After round three he went 'further' again.  I noticed in
>>Hsu's book that after round three, Kasparov was still fuming about game 2 and
>>used the expression "Hand of God" about one of the two moves (either axb or
>>Qb6/Be4, I don't remember which).  At that point, after round 3, I believe
>>he was told "no" for the printouts.  I will try to re-read the postscript
>>version of Hsu's book as I believe he had a detailed description of the events.
>>
>>From my perspective, _any_ suggestion of cheating was wrong... whether it
>>was after game 1, after game 6, or a year later.  There was _never_ any
>>evidence to support such a claim, in any form...
>
>
>Excuse me, but for the moment we have no proof that 1) Kasparov attended the
>press conference after game two and 2) Kasparov made public accusations against
>the DB team and IBM about cheating.
>
>Therefore it is not proven that the decision to not give Kasparov the prints was
>rightly based on his provocant behavior in public. This was exactly what you had
>stated in one of your articles. As we have F. Friedel present perhaps we can get
>more details.

I think this is what Ed Schroeder provided in a message a couple of hours
before yours:

http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?110294

Is this what you meant?

Andrew



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.