Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 3D-boards in chessprograms - a message to all you chessprogrammers

Author: Dennis A. Bourgerie

Date: 20:14:00 06/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 01, 2000 at 20:37:02, Pete Galati wrote:

>On June 01, 2000 at 17:16:46, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On June 01, 2000 at 17:14:41, KarinsDad wrote:
>>
>>>On June 01, 2000 at 16:14:54, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>>Better yet, can the ugly 3-D boards altogether and just use the Winboard design.
>>>>It's much better than any 3-D board design ever.
>>>>
>>>>I prefer the Winboard interface to the real thing, as pieces don't get in the
>>>>way, and the wrong angle won't cause problems.
>>>>
>>>>Besides which, in real life, our head does not sit still as we play.  We move it
>>>>a bit and see the board from different angles.  You can't do that with a
>>>>computer display (without some funky "virtual reality" setup).
>>>
>>>
>>>How about a way to change the board view angle with the mouse (while holding
>>>down the right mouse button for example)? It wouldn't seem to make much of a
>>>difference between changing the position of your head and changing the position
>>>of the mouse?
>>
>>Does not matter.  I already like Winboard better than the real thing.  Even if
>>it could somehow perfectly mirror my own behavior, I still like a 2-D board
>>better.
>
>Believe it or not, the 3D board that I find the most acceptable it the one that
>comes with the old Cyrus program.  It's easy and fast adjusting the angle of the
>board, none of the pieces are ever obscured.  It's better than the 3D boards
>provided by Chessbase because the pieces are actually better, and you know
>instantly what piece you're looking at, and it doesn't cause any eye strain that
>I get from looking at horrendously bad 3D board displays.
>
>But I agree, 2D displays are better.  I prefer real tournament sized Chess
>pieces, but actually Chess _is_ played on a very 2 dimensional plane, and that's
>basically what a computer's monitor is, so the 3D boards aren't needed, it's
>something to sell the programs with, but they don't work very well.
>
>Pete
I never use the 3-D boards...it's much easier to follow the game with the 2-D
boards. It's better to use the programming time on the chess engine.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.