Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Blitzin is a NOT good Interface IMHO

Author: Pete R.

Date: 13:34:59 06/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On June 13, 2000 at 14:32:33, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On June 13, 2000 at 14:01:09, Pete R. wrote:
>
>>Because they are fun to watch.  I like to observe and try to see the move before
>>they play it, or if they play something else I can try to understand why. I can
>>save the game in PGN and then analyze it if something caught my attention.
>>Studying how strong players play is the best way to improve, IMO.  You can play
>>also play against them of course, and they give lectures, or running commentary
>>and analysis of games in big tournaments, etc.  Why would you want to go
>>somewhere where there are only amateurs, children, and cheaters??  It's also
>>entertaining to watch humans vs. computers, e.g. Hawkeye vs. any computer.  Just
>>amazing. And of course since you are here you have an interest in computer
>>chess, so you can watch humans vs. these programs or the programs against each
>>other.
>
>You're making an awful generalization IMO. Either you are blessed with the
>company of grandmasters or playing against amateurs, children and cheaters :o).
>I think that most people will use little or no time watching GM's play, nor
>would they understand much watching such a game. I know I wouldn't. The
>prescence of rated players is of little concern if you're only looking to play a
>game of chess, which is the majority I believe. Cheaters are just as frequent at
>ICC as anywhere else and computer programs can be found anywhere.
>
>Best wishes...
>Mogens

Well these are matters of preference, with the exception of your last comment.
I believe cheating among *registered* players at ICC is less than it would be at
any free site, because after sufficient complaint you will be investigated for
computer cheating, and either labelled as a computer user or else tossed out, in
which case you have lost a bit of real money.  So at least some incentive exists
to be an honest player.  My only comment about not being interested in observing
titled players is that perhaps you are not so concerned with improving your
game(?).  I guess I don't understand wanting to play chess, yet not being
interested in watching good chess.  I suppose one can play tennis and never
watch a Wimbledon, but if you have a real interest in your own skills you can
deeply appreciate the skills of a great player and see what you are striving
toward.  For major events ICC will have a GM giving live commentary on a game,
where he plays out different variations right on your board and explains the
plans.  IMO that sort of thing is worth paying for, but that's a personal
choice.  If you don't care you don't care.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.