Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Programming FAQ

Author: Chris Whittington

Date: 02:15:37 11/04/97

Go up one level in this thread



On November 03, 1997 at 17:53:43, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 03, 1997 at 14:23:13, Chris Whittington wrote:
>
>>
>>On November 03, 1997 at 12:57:32, Chris Carson wrote:
>>
>>>On November 03, 1997 at 12:43:55, Mark Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>Does anyone know of a Chess programming FAQ?
>>>>
>>>>I am writing a program, and have run into difficulties
>>>>trying to implement a Transposition Table combined with
>>>>iterative deepening, while working from written descriptions.
>>>>I think I need some pseudo-code examples.
>>>>
>>>>I also have some questions regarding bit-board representation
>>>>and how to implement them for maximum efficiency (I can't see
>>>>a way of doing it efficiently).
>>>>
>>>>If no-one knows of a FAQ, then I could post my questions here
>>>>but am not sure if this kind of post is acceptable.
>>>>
>>>>Either replies here, or direct email welcome.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Mark.
>>>
>>>Try:  http://www.xs4all.nl/~verhelst/chess/programming.html
>>
>>Or try the Crafty source. Everybody else does (which is no help to Bob
>>come a tournament).
>>
>>Chris Whittington
>>
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Chris Carson
>
>Actually, things aren't as bad as you think.  I've gotten quite a bit of
>"donated" code over the past couple of years.  Mark Bromley took my
>original
>rotated bitmap idea and created the "COMPACT_ATTACKS" version that runs
>much
>faster on PC's.  Others have suggested this and that.  And others simply
>like
>to talk about computer chess.
>
>All in all, it's been a "win"...
>
>I've won my share of computer tournaments.  I enjoy the WMCCC event
>because
>there is *no* "top dog" that is uncatchable, as we had in the last 10 or
>so
>ACM events (Deep *).  That makes things interesting, to say the least.
>
>I'm starting toward a new goal for '98, that of teaching Crafty how to
>attack.  I'm tired of seeing it defend.  Now it's time to start swinging
>a few punches offensively.  Maybe not quite as wild as CSTal swings, but
>swing nonetheless.  :)

I wonder how much the 'style' of a program relates to the personality of
its programmer ?

Thorsten, who speaks to most programmers, reckons there is a strong
correlation.

Chris

>
>Hopefully ideas will pop up in discussions here or on r.g.c.c, if we can
>get past the "noise factor" certain people like to create.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.