Author: KarinsDad
Date: 09:15:14 07/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2000 at 06:22:23, Chris Whittington wrote: [snip] > > > >"Gerber posted >>fine (with the exception of the few times he rambled to the point that I could >>not understand what he was saying at all)." > >"Overall, I found his [Gerber's] arguments non-persuasive, but usually well >thought out and >>not insulting" > >"They threw some insults in for good measure .... [this] is against the charter >and >>>>the moderators stepped in." > >I must admit to being confused by your posts. And I think it is important to be >fair to persons who are unable to defend themselves. Just who exactly was >"throwing insults"? > > >Chris Whittington Yes Chris, you are very good at not reading an overall post and it's intent, but focusing on points that appear contradictory, even when those points are explained later. You also do a superb job of snipping out the explanatory portions and leaving just those pieces that prove your point. You said this, you said that, can I remind you that you said this. Gerber was not directly insulting in the Gerber-Hyatt threads. He did insult a few times outside of those threads. Within the Gerber-Hyatt threads, he just trolled and rambled on. And later on, instead of going to the moderators with a complaint, he created a big anti-Hyatt moderation flap which was not insulting, but rather just a mess. Fine. I stand corrected. I turn over my king and resign. Now, run along and play, and find someone else to play your game against. KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.