Author: pavel
Date: 11:41:55 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 12:24:17, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 15, 2000 at 11:59:08, Michael de la Maza wrote: > >>Junior is humming along, not losing a single game, and forcing some of the best >>players in the world to play perfectly in order to salvage draws. >> >>Then Kramnik illustrates how to punish Junior. >> >>_All_ of the GMs _instantly_ get it. Some of them apply the lessons better than >>others, but all of them make Junior look silly and none of them lose. >> >>GMs are amazing. >> >>When the history of computer chess is written, it will be divided into the >>pre-Kramnik and post-Kramnik era. > >If you had followed the recent tournaments with computer program participation, >you would have noticed that Kramnik was far from being the first Grandmaster to >utilize an anti-computer strategy succesfully. I think he reffered to the concept of "how easily human (in this case GM) learns". In this tourny kramnik pointed out the "weakness" others are following it (though DJ lost just 2 games). But I think most GM dont know anti-computer games. if they understand the concept of anti-computer games than the face of this tourny "would be a LOT differant" IMO. but again I maybe wrong..... thanks pavel > >Best wishes... >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.