Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:02:59 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 14:41:55, pavel wrote: >I think he reffered to the concept of "how easily human (in this case GM) >learns". In this tourny kramnik pointed out the "weakness" others are following >it (though DJ lost just 2 games). But I think most GM dont know anti-computer >games. if they understand the concept of anti-computer games than the face of >this tourny "would be a LOT differant" IMO. >but again I maybe wrong..... >thanks >pavel I just observed that a similar strategy was employed at the Dutch championships, so the Kramnik approach isn't exactly a novelty. Most of the GM's at Dortmund probably thought they could manage Junior playing their own type of game, which they barely could besides. If they had been wise enough to study the games played by Fritz recently at various events, I doubt the neverending TPR calculation would be quite as interesting. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.