Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderator Test Suite

Author: Mark Ryan

Date: 21:23:39 07/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 2000 at 21:06:49, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On July 24, 2000 at 20:35:28, Ratko V Tomic wrote:
>
>>> Anyway perhaps it would be a good idea to have a
>>> Moderator Test Suite, in the same vein as chess position
>>> test suites.  List a number of very specific examples,
>>> and ask each moderator candidate to explain what if
>>> any action they would take in each example, and why.
>>> This will give readers a better idea of what to expect.
>>
>>That's a great idea. We have had several "interesting"
>>situations and personalities here that incited lots of
>>passions. A questionare would ask how would the candidate
>>rule in any of those cases. For the benefit of the newer
>>members a brief description of a situation would be given
>>(in two versions, pro and con). The borderline situations,
>>just like this one, would be the most valuable ones.
>
>I don't think any of that is needed.  We know enough about just about anyone
>here who is likely to be nominated.
>
>Do they think clearly?  Can they reason logically?  Are they inflamatory?
>
>Quite frankly, I think *most* of the posters here would do a good job (though
>perhaps not the sort of job *I* would like best).
>
>It's really not that difficult.  Just busy-work mostly, and even that is fairly
>infrequent.  It seems to go in cycles of high/low, with new elections being a
>very sharp spike upwards for some inexplicable reason.
>
>Any perceived lack of action by the moderators is surely the fault of the
>regular CCC members for not using the moderator request form.  If enough people
>are offended by anything, the moderators surely will act -- even if it is
>themselves that they must censor.

Hi:  In fact, the Moderator Test Suite already exists.  Before the most recent
moderator elections, CCC members were allowed to ask the nominated moderators
any question.  I read every nominee response, as well as there "platform"
statements, and if I had any other questions, I was free to ask.  I voted
largely on the basis of the answers (as well as day-to-day CCC performance).
And of course all of this was available well before the election.  As a result I
have not been surprised by the performance of any of the current moderators.
Best regards,
Mark




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.