Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 13:44:24 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 11:28:44, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 10:25:14, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>I fully agree with you because i have spoked with a lot of strong players and >>almost everyone plays and analyzes with Fritz all day long. >> >>In the next list august 4 or 5 we are going to subtract maybee 100 points (still >>under discussion) > >Why do you want to subtract a hundred points? What would it accomplish? As long >as the ratings are clearly inflated it's difficult to compare to human ELO >numbers. By making the numbers more realistic you just encourage more >unreasonable comparison. > >Best wishes... >Mogens Hi! Speake out! What do you mean with "clearly inflated". As most people understand it's not very much inflation in the SSDF-list. The difference between now and then is that people nowadays know how to play a computer. Compare it with the program of your choice with the results from yesterday and today. I have played thousands of games against Mach3 (Avantgarde) and my results today is much better. Why?! I guess Mach3 is still as strong as before against an unexperienced player or is it a year 2000 problem....? Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.