Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 06:51:32 07/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 16:44:24, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 11:28:44, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On July 28, 2000 at 10:25:14, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>>I fully agree with you because i have spoked with a lot of strong players and >>>almost everyone plays and analyzes with Fritz all day long. >>> >>>In the next list august 4 or 5 we are going to subtract maybee 100 points (still >>>under discussion) >> >>Why do you want to subtract a hundred points? What would it accomplish? As long >>as the ratings are clearly inflated it's difficult to compare to human ELO >>numbers. By making the numbers more realistic you just encourage more >>unreasonable comparison. >> >>Best wishes... >>Mogens >Hi! > >Speake out! > >What do you mean with "clearly inflated". As most people understand it's not >very much inflation in the SSDF-list. The difference between now and then is >that people nowadays know how to play a computer. Compare it with the program of > your choice with the results from yesterday and today. I have played thousands >of games against Mach3 (Avantgarde) and my results today is much better. Why?! >I guess Mach3 is still as strong as before against an unexperienced player or is >it a year 2000 problem....? > >Bertil No. If you had played thousands of games... watched another thousands... then believe me or not - you are no more 'unexperienced player'. -Andrew-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.