Author: Derrick Wilson
Date: 22:23:29 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 22:08:03, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 21:08:38, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: > >>On July 28, 2000 at 05:21:49, Derrick Wilson wrote: >> >>>On July 28, 2000 at 03:32:42, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >>> >>>>On July 28, 2000 at 03:20:29, Derrick Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 28, 2000 at 01:16:36, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 28, 2000 at 00:58:14, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I made comparison between Carson's latest human list and SSDF to clear >>>>>>>possible level difference. But it's very difficult, when there are not many >>>>>>>exactly same software and hardware combinations. I removed multiprosessor >>>>>>>results and made assumption, that difference between 200MMX and 450 Mhz is 79p >>>>>>>(for comp-comp, sure not for human-comp). Here's some figures: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Program average speed Against humans SSDF rating difference >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rebel 431Mhz 2549/33 games 2594 (200MMX+79p) -45 >>>>>>> Fritz6 500Mhz 2457/15 2721 (450) -264 >>>>>>> Hiarcs6 272Mhz 2573/20 2518 (200MMX) +55 >>>>>>> Shredder 500Mhz 2495/8 2676 (450) -181 >>>>>>> CM5/6K 375Mhz 2521/14 2653 (200MMX+79p) -132 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This means, that average difference (Against human - SSDF rating) is -85p. >>>>>>>(Weighted difference for all 90 games). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I think this confirms general feeling, that SSDF must drop level by 100 points. >>>>>>>Counting these multiprosessor Junior/Fritz may still lower level. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I this this kind of list is much more reasonable than current: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2621 >>>>>>> 2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2589 >>>>>>> 3 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 2571 >>>>>>> 4 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2554 >>>>>>> 5 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2553 >>>>>>> 6 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2526 >>>>>>> 6 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2526 >>>>>>> 8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2524 >>>>>>> 9 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2523 >>>>>>> 10 Hiarcs 7.32 64MB P200 MMX 2477 >>>>>>> 11 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2475 >>>>>>> 12 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2474 >>>>>>> 13 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2460 >>>>>>> 13 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2460 >>>>>>> 15 Nimzo 99 64MB P200 MMX 2449 >>>>>>> 16 Junior 5.0 64MB P200 MMX 2437 >>>>>>> 17 Nimzo 98 58MB P200 MMX 2425 >>>>>>> 18 Rebel 9.0 47MB P200 MMX 2420 >>>>>>> 19 Hiarcs 6.0 49MB P200 MMX 2418 >>>>>>> 20 Rebel 8.0 51MB P200 MMX 2410 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Jouni >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes, but if you leave Fritz6 on top it is too inflated compared to human games, >>>>>> and dropping hiarcs rating would be a problem as well since it earned its >>>>>>rating 2573, it seems like the damage is done and you need a separate ratings >>>>>>list for comps vs human. I do not think you can just lower the ratings straight >>>>>>across the board. >>>>>> Lanny >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What evidence do you have that Fritz6 rating would be inflated? I hope your >>>>>not going by the few games played at the israeli league? >>>> >>>>did you look at the text that was posted above? , then you should see what >>>>"evidence" I am going by. fritz6 500mhz 2457/15 against humans an against >>>>computers is 2721 , if this is correct or not ask Jouni those are the numbers >>>>given and I am giving an opinion off of the numbers given. >>> >>> >>> In other words you don't care whatever or not the figures are accurate you >>>don't mind making assumptions on Data that has not proven to be reliable?? >> >Sorry for otherresponse tomuch coffee??) To answer in a more mature tone, I do >not mind making assumptions based on data even if not true, I would make the >assumption and then I would also state I didnt feel the data was correct. I did >check with ssdf because I was wondering why Chessmaster and rebel was rated >higher on this list , then realised it was because they are using stronger >proccessors here. For the other list,I followed a lot of the games from before >and figure be true and since I do not have time to scour up the games and >recheck all the wins and losses of the 90 games in the message I didnt feel it >to be a bad thing at all to give an opinion based on the data above. > Thanks , > Lanny No offense was intended, I tried to give you a private response by email, but apparently your email address is not current.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.