Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which Algorithm is considered the best ?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:37:59 08/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 08, 2000 at 13:06:34, Dan Andersson wrote:

>You should look up the word bulverism in a dictionary, you did it again. BTW
>when discussing a search algorithm you do a lot better analyzing its average
>case than its extreme case. I really dont know if MTD is better than PVS, but I
>believe it cannot be all that much worse. You better accept it, I use the
>Satanic-Algorithm (MTD) and not the Cuddly-Good (PVS-NS) way.

For the non C. S. Lewis fans (I don't think bulverism is a real word):

"C.S Lewis warned against the dangers of Bulverism, the ad hominem argument
taken to the final extreme. There is no need to refute someone's position. Just
come up with a plausible explanation of how that opinion might have formed, and
the job is done."



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.