Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 10:17:06 08/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2000 at 13:12:06, pavel wrote: >On August 11, 2000 at 12:29:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 11, 2000 at 08:42:11, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 11, 2000 at 07:32:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On August 11, 2000 at 04:11:12, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>I wonder, if it's possible to arrange match between the two top rated (against >>>>>humans) programs: Deep Junior 2702 (8*700Mhz) and PConners 2663 (160*300Mhz)? >>>>>Mini match with 4-10 games will give interesting info about their strength! >>>>>Just on idea... >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>I have seen P.Conners playing quite a lot. P.Conners is like junior: >>>>not a very good eval (very bad in fact), but searching tactical lines >>>>very deep. P.Conners runs on more processors like junior. So it's >>>>not hard to imagine p.conners destroying its smaller brother completely. >>> >>> >>>I believe that Junior has better evaluation function relative to P.Conners. >>> >>>I know that the main difference between Junior5 and Junior6 is the evaluation >>>function. >> >>Nothing + 1 = still nothing >> >>>Uri > > >nothing ( o ) + 1 = 1 > >pavel Maybe he meant: nothing*improvement factor=nothing :o)) Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.