Author: pavel
Date: 10:18:27 08/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2000 at 13:17:06, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On August 11, 2000 at 13:12:06, pavel wrote: > >>On August 11, 2000 at 12:29:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On August 11, 2000 at 08:42:11, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On August 11, 2000 at 07:32:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 11, 2000 at 04:11:12, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I wonder, if it's possible to arrange match between the two top rated (against >>>>>>humans) programs: Deep Junior 2702 (8*700Mhz) and PConners 2663 (160*300Mhz)? >>>>>>Mini match with 4-10 games will give interesting info about their strength! >>>>>>Just on idea... >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>> >>>>>I have seen P.Conners playing quite a lot. P.Conners is like junior: >>>>>not a very good eval (very bad in fact), but searching tactical lines >>>>>very deep. P.Conners runs on more processors like junior. So it's >>>>>not hard to imagine p.conners destroying its smaller brother completely. >>>> >>>> >>>>I believe that Junior has better evaluation function relative to P.Conners. >>>> >>>>I know that the main difference between Junior5 and Junior6 is the evaluation >>>>function. >>> >>>Nothing + 1 = still nothing >>> >>>>Uri >> >> >>nothing ( o ) + 1 = 1 >> >>pavel > >Maybe he meant: > >nothing*improvement factor=nothing :o)) > >Best wishes... >Mogens I really dont know what he meant ... but the above "statement" by him didnt make sense to me at all....... :) pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.