Author: stuart taylor
Date: 12:56:18 08/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2000 at 15:45:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 31, 2000 at 15:06:24, Jonathan Lee wrote: > >>Title: Grandmaters in Gigahertz (catchy title, anagram) >>What are the predictions for the IGM's? >>I predict at 200 GHZ the IGM's will draw or lose >>(40 moves in 2 hours and sudden death in 1 or 2 hours, standard tournament time >>control). >> >>Then at 3,000 GHZ the IGM's will always lose. >>(same time control as above 40mvs in 2hrs., SD in 1 or 2 hrs.) > >I do not believe it. >I believe the number of the GHZ with the same software is not going to help >always to win. > >If you get a draw position out of book no number of GH is going to help you to >win. > >I also do not know if chess is complicated enough to let program to get 100% >against GM's. > >Maybe you need to look for another game if you want programs to score 100% > >> >>The software is there, but the hardware is lagging. >>Jonathan (53rd message) > >I do not like crticizing the hardware. >I believe that it is also correct that the hardware is fast enough to win all >humans in a match and the software is the problem. > >Uri Chess, not complicated enough? If it can steer every game into complicated tactics, then I think it IS complicated enough. Much more still, if it can get into problem like positions. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.