Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 06:31:35 09/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2000 at 01:06:09, Chessfun wrote: >On September 22, 2000 at 20:40:29, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On September 22, 2000 at 16:55:12, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>I recently found LG2000 v2.9a a bit of a ?. >>>Blackdemon at chessnet claims to use this on a PII 233 processor >>>and my record with Yace against him is not good, something like >>>lose 50% more than win. Though then I ran 50 blitz games at home >>>and found Yace won as I recall by 5 or 6. >>> >>>LG2000 v2.9a is I think a good choice. >> >>Thank you for the advice and I think it's a good choice due to its tactical >>strength. I'll run quite a few Yace_def - Yace_low4 games first at G/10 and then >>individually against LG2000 at a slightly slower timecontrol. >> >>Are the Yace games at Chess.net primarily blitz? >> >>Mogens. > > >With it being automated that is mainly the choice of the opponent >but yes I would say the most popular times are 5/3 5/2 3/1 3/0. > >Sarah. It's great to see so many testers of Yace. Can i download some of the games you mention somewhere? Perhaps get a database of Yace games and see if it makes any common errors or hates certain openings.. I'm coming to feel that the Bolesalavsky variation in the sicilian defence (1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cd 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Be2 e5 is a bad choice for Yace.) It just doesn't understand that d5 is a key point to control..The book i'm using is i think from Mogens site.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.