Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 21:10:08 09/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2000 at 09:31:35, Aaron Tay wrote: >On September 23, 2000 at 01:06:09, Chessfun wrote: > >>On September 22, 2000 at 20:40:29, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On September 22, 2000 at 16:55:12, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>I recently found LG2000 v2.9a a bit of a ?. >>>>Blackdemon at chessnet claims to use this on a PII 233 processor >>>>and my record with Yace against him is not good, something like >>>>lose 50% more than win. Though then I ran 50 blitz games at home >>>>and found Yace won as I recall by 5 or 6. >>>> >>>>LG2000 v2.9a is I think a good choice. >>> >>>Thank you for the advice and I think it's a good choice due to its tactical >>>strength. I'll run quite a few Yace_def - Yace_low4 games first at G/10 and then >>>individually against LG2000 at a slightly slower timecontrol. >>> >>>Are the Yace games at Chess.net primarily blitz? >>> >>>Mogens. >> >> >>With it being automated that is mainly the choice of the opponent >>but yes I would say the most popular times are 5/3 5/2 3/1 3/0. >> >>Sarah. > > >It's great to see so many testers of Yace. Can i download some of the games you >mention somewhere? Perhaps get a database of Yace games and see if it makes any >common errors or hates certain openings.. > >I'm coming to feel that the Bolesalavsky variation in the sicilian defence (1 e4 >c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cd 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Be2 e5 is a bad choice for Yace.) It >just doesn't understand that d5 is a key point to control..The book i'm using is > i think from Mogens site. Yace's games on the ICC that have been played under the account counterplay are available at memebers.home.net/nexus1/main.html
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.