Author: Tony Werten
Date: 07:19:34 10/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2000 at 10:07:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 10, 2000 at 09:00:28, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On October 10, 2000 at 07:31:37, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 10, 2000 at 07:05:45, Graham Laight wrote: >>> >>>>It seems to me that PCs' results against GMs are tapering off into a flat line. >>>>The current style of program may have come as far as they can go. >>>> >>>>The battle to generate the highest NPS score is no longer improving the >>>>computers' performance against humans. Even Deep Junior running on a quad >>>>processor is only able to score 4.5/9 against the top players. >>> >>>Only??? >>> >>>4.5/9 is a wonderful result. >>> >>>No longer improving the computers performance??? >>> >>>4.5/9 against players with average rating of 2700 is the best result of >>>computers against humans(if I do not include the result of Deeper blue). >>> >>>It is even better than the result of deep blue(1996) against kasparov. >> >>????? >> >>If numbers tell you that scoring 50 % against the almost best players is better >>than defeating the best player then you at least have to consider if those >>numbers are wrong. >> >>cheers, >> >>Tony > >I was talking about Deep blue 1996. > >I think that getting 50% against the players that Deep Junior played is better >than losing 4:2 against kasparov. > >I did not say that it is better than winning kasparov but the match that >kasparov lost was in 1997. > >Uri My mistake. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.