Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:07:58 10/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2000 at 09:00:28, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 10, 2000 at 07:31:37, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 10, 2000 at 07:05:45, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>It seems to me that PCs' results against GMs are tapering off into a flat line. >>>The current style of program may have come as far as they can go. >>> >>>The battle to generate the highest NPS score is no longer improving the >>>computers' performance against humans. Even Deep Junior running on a quad >>>processor is only able to score 4.5/9 against the top players. >> >>Only??? >> >>4.5/9 is a wonderful result. >> >>No longer improving the computers performance??? >> >>4.5/9 against players with average rating of 2700 is the best result of >>computers against humans(if I do not include the result of Deeper blue). >> >>It is even better than the result of deep blue(1996) against kasparov. > >????? > >If numbers tell you that scoring 50 % against the almost best players is better >than defeating the best player then you at least have to consider if those >numbers are wrong. > >cheers, > >Tony I was talking about Deep blue 1996. I think that getting 50% against the players that Deep Junior played is better than losing 4:2 against kasparov. I did not say that it is better than winning kasparov but the match that kasparov lost was in 1997. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.