Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:57:10 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 09:05:45, Bas Hamstra wrote: >Albert, > >Thanks for your long post. > >I am sorry I am so hard to convince. In the dutch open I see indeed an attacking >game against Nimzo. I am not impressed by it, just well tuned speculative >evaluation. Now let's see the other strong opponents: > >- Against The King it was within 10 moves in the endgame It is not tiger's fault that the king decided to go to a bad endgame. What did you expect from tiger? Did you expect it to avoid trading queens to a better endgame? >- Bloodless draw against Quest > >The others don't count, they are all weak amateurs that are badly outsearched. > >Furhter I don't think Tiger-Nimzo is any more special than King-Nimzo. I disagree. please post the move in king-nimzo that no program plays. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.