Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:15:13 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 14:54:41, stuart taylor wrote: >On October 17, 2000 at 06:10:08, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 16, 2000 at 13:27:05, stuart taylor wrote: >>>I had understood that! What could I want more than that? >>>So now we have either strong, OR with a brilliant playing style? >>>S.Taylor >> >>Unclear. >>IMO gambit tiger is by all means stronger than normal tiger. >>some people say different. its maybe to early to measure it exactly. >>we have not enough time to play 40/120 games yet, only most games >>60/60 or faster. >> >>IMO gambit tiger plays better. >>it gets better scores. >>and plays moe attractive. >> >>if christophe would have chosen normal tiger in the dutch >>championship or french-championship i doubt if the results would >>have been as good. > >Stronger than normal tiger 13? >S.Taylor Yes, some say it is. I'm not sure. Anyway it looks like they are very close, but with different playing styles. Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.