Author: stuart taylor
Date: 11:54:41 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 06:10:08, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 16, 2000 at 13:27:05, stuart taylor wrote: >>I had understood that! What could I want more than that? >>So now we have either strong, OR with a brilliant playing style? >>S.Taylor > >Unclear. >IMO gambit tiger is by all means stronger than normal tiger. >some people say different. its maybe to early to measure it exactly. >we have not enough time to play 40/120 games yet, only most games >60/60 or faster. > >IMO gambit tiger plays better. >it gets better scores. >and plays moe attractive. > >if christophe would have chosen normal tiger in the dutch >championship or french-championship i doubt if the results would >have been as good. Stronger than normal tiger 13? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.