Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:15:44 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 14:54:41, stuart taylor wrote:
>On October 17, 2000 at 06:10:08, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On October 16, 2000 at 13:27:05, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>I had understood that! What could I want more than that?
>>>So now we have either strong, OR with a brilliant playing style?
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>Unclear.
>>IMO gambit tiger is by all means stronger than normal tiger.
>>some people say different. its maybe to early to measure it exactly.
>>we have not enough time to play 40/120 games yet, only most games
>>60/60 or faster.
>>
>>IMO gambit tiger plays better.
>>it gets better scores.
>>and plays moe attractive.
>>
>>if christophe would have chosen normal tiger in the dutch
>>championship or french-championship i doubt if the results would
>>have been as good.
>
>Stronger than normal tiger 13?
>S.Taylor
Yes, some say it is. I'm not sure. Anyway it looks like they are very close, but
with different playing styles.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.