Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:10:08 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2000 at 13:27:05, stuart taylor wrote: >I had understood that! What could I want more than that? >So now we have either strong, OR with a brilliant playing style? >S.Taylor Unclear. IMO gambit tiger is by all means stronger than normal tiger. some people say different. its maybe to early to measure it exactly. we have not enough time to play 40/120 games yet, only most games 60/60 or faster. IMO gambit tiger plays better. it gets better scores. and plays moe attractive. if christophe would have chosen normal tiger in the dutch championship or french-championship i doubt if the results would have been as good.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.