Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thanks, Paulo! Re: Some more test position with the same team(Nxa1 bad)

Author: Paulo Soares

Date: 17:19:42 10/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 24, 2000 at 21:20:01, Eelco de Groot wrote:

(snipped)
>This variation was the best I could do to "repair" the sacrifice; after 1. Bxc4
>dxc3 2. Bxf7+ Ke7 3. Qb3 Nf6 maybe the more correct way to fight on would be
>with 4.Ng5: 12.02  -0.11   4.Ng5 cxb2 5.Qxb2 Qb6 6.Qd2 Nxe4 7.Ba3+. At least
>that's what I had as best output before I unwisely decided to see what was
>happening here still having seven chess-engines running as well.. Minus .11
>pawns but the situation is not very clear yet, to say the least. Into the
>swirling snow, trying to find a passage up the forbidding mountain, this is
>chess!
>
>Regards, Eelco
>
>http://www.thelordoftherings.org/multimedia/images/nasmith-01.html
>(Being something of a Tolkien-fan, I've got this calendar with Ted Nasmith's
>pictures, from 1992, still hanging on the wall because of the beautiful
>illustrations. This seemed a fitting image.)

Eelco, after 6.Qd2, in your mainline, leave your favourite program
to choose the move and see what happens. In reality, 6...Nxe4
it's not a good move, may be 6...h6 is the best move
in the position.
Thanks by the picture, beatiful,and it sometimes transmits as
the people are when analyzing a position :)

Paulo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.