Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:43:45 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 16:21:54, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 06, 2000 at 16:13:43, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 06, 2000 at 15:17:32, Jonathan Lee wrote: >> >>>On November 06, 2000 at 01:43:48, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On November 05, 2000 at 15:33:57, Jonathan Lee wrote: >>>> >>>>>I understand Walter Irvin's point of view of contemporary greats versus >>>>>the others point of view who are talking about influential greats. >>>>>It would be safe to say that the 20th century influential greats (such as >>>>>Richard Lang) are a SUBSET of the year 2000 contemporary greats listed _some_ by >>>>>Walter Irvin. >>>>>Grandmasters in gigahertz: Just tell me how many gigahertz will it take to >>>>>equal Kramnik. >>>>>Jonathan (83rd message) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>500MHz will be enough. Not with current programs, but in several years software >>>>improvements will compensate. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>>500 GHZ >>>Jonathan (86th message) >> >>I am not christophe but I am almost sure that he means 500 mhz and not 500GHZ. >>I suspect that 500GHZ may be enough with the best programs of today. >> >>Uri > > >I meant 500MHz. > >500GHz is enough with programs of ten years ago. I disgree here. I do not think that 500GHz with programs of 1990 is enough. I believe that 500GHz with programs of 1990 are going to lose at tournament time control against the top programs of today on 1 GHz. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.