Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 13:21:54 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 16:13:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 06, 2000 at 15:17:32, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>
>>On November 06, 2000 at 01:43:48, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On November 05, 2000 at 15:33:57, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>>I understand Walter Irvin's point of view of contemporary greats versus
>>>>the others point of view who are talking about influential greats.
>>>>It would be safe to say that the 20th century influential greats (such as
>>>>Richard Lang) are a SUBSET of the year 2000 contemporary greats listed _some_ by
>>>>Walter Irvin.
>>>>Grandmasters in gigahertz: Just tell me how many gigahertz will it take to
>>>>equal Kramnik.
>>>>Jonathan (83rd message)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>500MHz will be enough. Not with current programs, but in several years software
>>>improvements will compensate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>500 GHZ
>>Jonathan (86th message)
>
>I am not christophe but I am almost sure that he means 500 mhz and not 500GHZ.
>I suspect that 500GHZ may be enough with the best programs of today.
>
>Uri
I meant 500MHz.
500GHz is enough with programs of ten years ago.
Christophe
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.