Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Christophe Theron, you mean 500 GHZ??? (NT)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:26:21 11/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 16:21:54, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On November 06, 2000 at 16:13:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On November 06, 2000 at 15:17:32, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>>
>>>On November 06, 2000 at 01:43:48, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 15:33:57, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I understand Walter Irvin's point of view of contemporary greats versus
>>>>>the others point of view who are talking about influential greats.
>>>>>It would be safe to say that the 20th century influential greats (such as
>>>>>Richard Lang) are a SUBSET of the year 2000 contemporary greats listed _some_ by
>>>>>Walter Irvin.
>>>>>Grandmasters in gigahertz:  Just tell me how many gigahertz will it take to
>>>>>equal Kramnik.
>>>>>Jonathan (83rd message)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>500MHz will be enough. Not with current programs, but in several years software
>>>>improvements will compensate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Christophe
>>>500 GHZ
>>>Jonathan (86th message)
>>
>>I am not christophe but I am almost sure that he means 500 mhz and not 500GHZ.
>>I suspect that 500GHZ may be enough with the best programs of today.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>I meant 500MHz.
>
>500GHz is enough with programs of ten years ago.
>
>
>
>    Christophe

I don't believe this.  DB ran at the equivalent of this speed and had real
problems.  DB2 also ran at this speed and did much better.  I don't think that
a 10 year old program would beat Kramnik, Kasparov, etc on most any hardware.
I don't believe today's programs would be anywhere near unbeatable at 500ghz
either.  They would definitely be tactically strong.  But they would still be
making the _same_ positional mistakes they always make.

In theory a couple of Khz would be enough to beat all humans.  In reality, that
won't _ever_ happen, most likely.  It will take a combination of hellishly fast
hardware + a lot more positional understanding than today's programs have.

IE until humans can no longer say "that is a 1400 level move" this isn't going
to turn into reality.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.