Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Based on tournament results - No!

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 03:27:24 11/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 08, 2000 at 11:48:06, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 08, 2000 at 01:59:24, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On November 07, 2000 at 09:48:43, Shanti wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>Shredder 5 played 1 tournament and won (world championship) and it wasn't the
>>>future release Shredder 5 but a beta version (Shredder 4 just won CCT2).
>>>
>>>Though GT is no weak program I think Shredder has proven itself to be a very
>>>strong program winning tournaments consistently.
>>>
>>>Shanti
>>
>>
>>No doubt, but that does not answer the question whether Shredder5 is the
>>strongest program available. Although, referring to the author, Shr5 isn't
>>available yet so it can't be the strongest prog available. :-)
>>Even if it were, this one Championship does not prove it, not enough games. Even
>>the two wins of Gambit Tiger in France and NL aren't enough.
>>Concerning the way how Shredder5 won the WCh, just look how GT won the other two
>>Chpships...
>>
>
>Yes... but then look at the overall strength of all the opponents in all the
>tournaments you are looking at.  The WMCCC had a stronger field by a big margin.

A stronger field but less games so a bigger margin of error.


>
>
>
>>
>>>On November 07, 2000 at 08:18:52, Harald Faber wrote:
>>>
>>>>Based on tournament results, Gambit Tiger is because GT won *2* championships so
>>>>far against other top programs in a *decent* way.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.