Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger 13.0 without tablebases (a test position) !

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:49:25 11/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 15, 2000 at 16:57:46, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 15, 2000 at 16:31:20, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On November 15, 2000 at 16:06:55, Eric Campos wrote:
>>
>>>On November 15, 2000 at 12:56:21, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 15, 2000 at 12:41:36, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 15, 2000 at 11:16:24, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 15, 2000 at 11:12:30, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On November 15, 2000 at 09:52:03, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This position is real from a game ( but not from Tiger ) !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>[D]8/8/8/6Np/2N5/Pk6/6K1/8 w - a3 0 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In this position played a old version from Fritz 5 (Fritz-Nemeth) Ne5?
>>>>>>>>And the game was draw ! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I give now this position Tiger 13.0 for test an Tiger 13.0 played Ne5 ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(With tablebases Tiger how about better)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Eduard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ne4 is a mate in 26, of course.  But a program that doesn't
>>>>>>>support tablebases is probably not going to have a clue here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Junior5.9 without tablebase have no problem to find Ne4 with +4.08 score in a
>>>>>>short time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>
>>>>>Engine version   : Rebel Century 2.01
>>>>>Hash table size  :  28 Mb
>>>>>
>>>>>8/8/8/6Np/2N5/Pk6/6K1/8 w - -
>>>>>
>>>>>00:00  01.01  3.13  1.Ne4 Kxc4
>>>>>00:00  02.00  3.13  1.Ne4 Kxc4
>>>>>00:00  02.15  3.13  1.Ne5
>>>>>00:00  02.16  3.13  1.Nd6
>>>>>00:00  02.17  3.13  1.Ne3
>>>>>00:00  02.20  3.13  1.Nb6
>>>>>00:00  02.21  3.13  1.Nb2
>>>>>00:00  03.00  3.35  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4
>>>>>00:00  04.00  3.05  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.Kh3 Kb5
>>>>>00:00  04.01  3.05  1.Kg3
>>>>>00:02  05.00  3.05  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.Nf6 h4 3.a4
>>>>>00:03  05.01  3.05  1.Kg3
>>>>>00:03  05.02  3.12  1.Ne6 Kxc4 2.Nf4 h4 3.a4
>>>>>00:05  06.00  2.71  1.Ne6 Kxc4 2.Nc7 Kb3 3.Nb5 h4
>>>>>00:06  06.01  2.85  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.Nd2+ Kb5 3.Kg3 Ka4
>>>>>00:07  06.03  2.85  1.Kg3
>>>>>00:11  07.00  2.91  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.Nd2+ Kb5 3.Kg3 Ka4 4.Nc4
>>>>>00:27  08.00  2.90  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.Nd2+ Kb5 3.Kg3 Ka4 4.Nc4 Kb5 5.Nd6 Ka4
>>>>>01:15  09.00  2.79  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kb4 3.Nc3 Ka5 4.Kh3 Kb4 5.Kg3
>>>>>02:24  10.00  3.66  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kd5 3.Nc3 Kc6 4.Kh3 Kd7 5.a5 Kd6
>>>>>02:26  11.00  4.12  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kd5 3.Nc3+ Kd4 4.Kh3 Ke5 5.a5 Kd6 6.a6
>>>>>02:31  12.00  4.80  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kd5 3.Nc3+ Kd4 4.Kh3 Kc5 5.Kh4 Kc4 6.Kxh5
>>>>>Kb4
>>>>>02:40  13.00  4.81  1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kd5 3.Nc3+ Kd4 4.Kh3 Kc5 5.Kg2 Kb4 6.Kh3 Kc5
>>>>>7.Kg2 Kb4 8.Kh3
>>>>>
>>>>>Rebel Tiger 13.0
>>>>>
>>>>>Move: Nd2+  (3/22)  depth=16
>>>>>Score: 6.62   depth: 16
>>>>>Ne4 Kxa3 Kh3 h4 Ng6 Kb4 Nh7 Ka3 Ne5 Ka4 Nf6 Ka3 Nfg4 Ka4 Nd7 Kb4
>>>>>
>>>>>Tiger takes nearly 1.5 mins to find Ne4, yet Rebel 2.01 analysis engine in the
>>>>>Rebel 11.0 package finds Ne4 instantly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Try them against a tablebase program to see if they can _win_ the position.
>>>>It is not easy.  The eval of +4 shows they likely don't understand...
>>>
>>>
>>>I hope someone does try this (I still haven't installed any tablebase programs
>>>-- but I will).  I can't picture today's programs not winning after finding
>>>1.Ne4 Kxc4 2.a4 Kd5 3.Nc3+, because the rest is just counting the race to the
>>>h-pawn, which programs seem to do a lot better than I do!
>>>
>>>- Eric
>>
>>
>>If you win the h pawn, you draw.  That is the point of this ending.  two
>>knights can not force mate against the lone king, unless the lone king has
>>a pawn so it won't be stalemated near the end...
>
>You missed the fact that after 1.Ne4 Kxc4 white has only one knight.
>
>avoiding Kxc4 is not going to help black because in this case white has two
>knights and a pawn and has no problem to win so programs with the knowledge that
>KNN vs K is a draw and with the knowledge that KNN vs KP is often a draw have no
>problem to win the game and the defence of black is not important.
>
>Uri


Sorry.  Set the position up wrong here.  I worked this in while trying to
finish up reading a Ph.D. dissertation (had a student of mine defend this
morning).

Bob



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.