Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:43:19 11/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2000 at 14:39:50, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On November 16, 2000 at 14:28:14, Ritter Rost wrote: > >>On November 16, 2000 at 13:24:25, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2000 at 09:07:23, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>to me programs fall into 2 list bean counters and knowledge based . >>>>bean counters >>>>fritz >>>>junior >>>>nimzo >>>>lg2000a >>>> >>>>knowledge based >>>>shredder >>>>hiarcs >>>>rebel >>>>tiger >>>>diep >>>>crafty >>>>king >>>> >>>>now you would think that the knowledge based programs would destroy bean >>>>counters .but that is usually not the case .bean counters are some of the best >>>>and strongest .which makes me wonder if trying to put so much knowledge in a >>>>program really makes it better .i think that depth of search would count for >>>>more than knowledge . >>> >>>To me, they fall into two categories, A-M, and N-Z. I think that the balance of >>>power has favored A-M (Genius, MChess, Fritz, Hiarcs), but over time we are >>>seeing an increase in strength in N-Z (Shredder, Tiger, Nimzo). >>> >>>My personal favorites are mostly A-M programs, and my own program is definitely >>>an A-M program (Ferret), but I do have a few sentimental favorites in the N-Z's >>>(XXXX). >>> >>>The A-M's also include the top mainframe programs (Deep Blue, Hitech, Cray >>>Blitz), and the best open-source program (Crafty), so all in all I think that >>>A-M is still doing better than N-Z. >>> >>>bruce >> >>For me this is the post of the year. > >Agree > >Bertil The only thing I couldn't figure out is which group is "new paradigm"??? :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.