Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:28:02 11/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2000 at 07:01:40, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On November 15, 2000 at 11:12:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 15, 2000 at 09:52:03, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>This position is real from a game ( but not from Tiger ) ! >>> >>>[D]8/8/8/6Np/2N5/Pk6/6K1/8 w - a3 0 1 >>> >>>In this position played a old version from Fritz 5 (Fritz-Nemeth) Ne5? >>>And the game was draw ! :) >>> >>>I give now this position Tiger 13.0 for test an Tiger 13.0 played Ne5 ? >>> >>>(With tablebases Tiger how about better) >>> >>>Eduard >> >> >>Ne4 is a mate in 26, of course. But a program that doesn't >>support tablebases is probably not going to have a clue here. > >A fun point is that a4 is a mate in 92, and the best reply is Kxa4. If "best" >play is followed, it doesn't draw by 50-move-rule either. > >Ne5 is something like mate in 88, but I'm not sure of the exact number. It also >doesn't draw by 50-moves. After Ne5 I get mated in 91 for black, which would mean Ne5 is a mate in 92 for white...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.