Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 03:14:32 12/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2000 at 00:44:00, Michael Cummings wrote: >I doubt the moderators after reading the post in question will even think twice >about it. In my time I have accused the SSDF of being rubbish, there was a story >when the 450 machines came in and all the programs that were being tested and >thus on top of the list all seemed to be chessbase programs. > >We even had a poll question asking people if there was some type of agenda. Did >anyone care about slander. Maybe this difference has something to do with the alertness of our own SAFP (Self Appointed Forum Police) ;) > >A whole lot more worse things have been said about the SSDF, and Bert has >denfend himself. I think on this matter that you may be the lone ranger of >complaints in regard to this thread. > >The thread is harmless, the SSDF might have a reputation as being the devil in >this regard. To say it is slander to utter rubbish and a waste of thread space. > >Further more, when you say to dance with the devil, it is simply a figure of >speech. I could say that debating this thread with you, I am dancing with the >Devil. And you could make this to an endless maddening rave party. Serving the purposes of whom? But I understand your point; if you enter a house set to flames you are likely to get burned...;) Sune Larsson > >Now what context would I be saying this in. I have no idea of your history, no >problem with you. I am simply saying it in the context that no matter what I say >you are not going to back down on your opinions. So if I am dancing with the >Devil (you), it means I am putting myself in a bad position since I am sure not >going to win the arguement with you, so for me to keep debating the point is >pointless. > >When you Dance with the Devil you are putting yourself in a bad situation. > >And since you clearly state that this is the problem point, (which in my other >post you pointed this out to me) > >Ed has had previous problems in his dealings with the SSDF, so for him to go >back to them, He is Dancing with the Devil, or his Devil I should say. > >Which is very clear to me when I read the so called offending post. > >Its Ed's Devil, not everyone's. > >I would sure love to see (not) the day when Cigarette companies sue people who >say, smoking fags is danicing with the Devil. Ohhhh Slander against Cigarette >companies.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.