Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: Nothing wrong with the thread

Author: Michael Cummings

Date: 16:28:42 12/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 16, 2000 at 07:06:49, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On December 16, 2000 at 00:44:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
>[snip dancing with devils starring M. Cummings :o)]
>
>Just to set the record straight. The word used was "dealing", not "dancing",
>which changes the meaning quite a bit in my mind and renders your examples
>unusable in this context.

Dealing with the devil and Dancing are both the same to me. Either way you are
playing in the lions den. So if I was going to use these things, I would use
them both in the same way

eg ;

Ed you are Dancing with the Devil going back to the SSDF
Ed you are dealing with the Devil doing back to the SSDF

Or Ed, I know you have had problems with the SSDF, so either way going back is
bad for you, which the above two statements I feel are the same

>3) The SSDF cheat and manipulate results and anyone offering their program for
>testing is dealing with the devil.
>
>Which are acceptable in a moderated forum, Mr. Cummings?
>

Well the last one is not acceptable, but again, he did not call them cheats, he
said there was a possibility of maybe something wrong, which he then goes on to
give the impression that since there is no proof I think he doubts it himself.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.