Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 17:06:39 12/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2000 at 19:28:42, Michael Cummings wrote: >On December 16, 2000 at 07:06:49, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On December 16, 2000 at 00:44:00, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>[snip dancing with devils starring M. Cummings :o)] >> >>Just to set the record straight. The word used was "dealing", not "dancing", >>which changes the meaning quite a bit in my mind and renders your examples >>unusable in this context. > >Dealing with the devil and Dancing are both the same to me. Either way you are >playing in the lions den. So if I was going to use these things, I would use >them both in the same way > >eg ; > >Ed you are Dancing with the Devil going back to the SSDF >Ed you are dealing with the Devil doing back to the SSDF > >Or Ed, I know you have had problems with the SSDF, so either way going back is >bad for you, which the above two statements I feel are the same > >>3) The SSDF cheat and manipulate results and anyone offering their program for >>testing is dealing with the devil. >> >>Which are acceptable in a moderated forum, Mr. Cummings? >> > >Well the last one is not acceptable, but again, he did not call them cheats, he >said there was a possibility of maybe something wrong, which he then goes on to >give the impression that since there is no proof I think he doubts it himself. If you can read, he used the word cheating. You don't have to defend him or yourself just say anything it's ok against the devil. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.