Author: José Carlos
Date: 01:36:38 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 03:39:45, Steve Maughan wrote: >Uri, > >>It proves nothing because TSCP is not optimized to be fast and if you start >>with an optimization of TSCP that only runs 2 times faster you can get >>different results. > >See my other post but you'll see that since it's not optimized for speed i.e. >few c orientated 'tricks' IMOm tricks _are_ part of the languaje, so if C offers tricks Delphi does not, then it is a Delphi problem. I see no point in comparing _the same instructions_ implementation for both languajes. They must be very similar! The interesting comparison (again, IMO) is using so languaje tricks as possible in both languajes, and see how can you optimize the thing. But it's just a point of view. Your point can be interesting too. José C. >it is easier to make a literal translation into >Delphi. Of course one cannot make a definitive statement as to how Delphi >compares to VC but at least one can say that it's 'in the ball park'. I'd have >been most concerned if the literal Delphi version ran at 50% of the speed of the >VC version. > >Regards, > >Steve Maughan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.