Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anand FIDE World Champion: Anand-Shirov 3,5-0,5

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 00:05:03 12/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 25, 2000 at 02:20:46, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On December 24, 2000 at 17:15:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On December 24, 2000 at 13:11:49, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On December 24, 2000 at 09:09:27, Jeroen Noomen wrote:
>>>
>>>>My congratulations to Vishy Anand, for winning the
>>>>FIDE World Championship 2000!
>>>>
>>>>3,5-0,5 in the final against Shirov, that leaves no
>>>>discussion whatsoever. Anand was the best, remained
>>>>unbeaten and scored a clear victory in the final.
>>>>Well done!
>>>>
>>>>Jeroen
>>>
>>>
>>>I am still absolutely amazed that a World Championship can be decided this way.
>>>
>>>A score of 3.5-0.5 is not statistically significant, not even with a low
>>>confidence.
>>>
>>
>>
>>What a crap.
>
>
>Thanks. Critisism from you tells me there must be some truth in what I say.
>
>
>
>
>>First of all all insignificant statistical elements that cause confusion
>>were not allowed to join in this worldchamp in the first place.
>>
>>Secondly 3.5-0.5 in a final is very impressive.
>>
>>third did you forget how TOUGH anand had it to get into finals and how
>>easily Shirov came there when looking who they played?
>>
>>Note that Shirov showed to be worlds best blitz player by
>>knocking out people in blitz in a very convincing way!
>>
>>>It is now clear, at least amongst the experienced computers chess operators,
>>>that such a result means NOTHING.
>>
>>You clearly don't see difference between what a computer is where any
>>detail can distract scores or give weird results and a
>>world championship mankind where no detail is getting done by random
>>generator...
>
>
>The kind of chess that computers play is not produced by a random generator.

The opening choice may be produced by a random generator when it is not the case
with humans.

Humans after losing a game analyze the game to see when they went wrong.

Programs simply play another line.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.