Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 21:52:04 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 12:05:11, Joshua Lee wrote: >Qg6 is better and i had already mention analizing in reverse ...at 23Qg6 is >prefered over Qg4 at 16Ply so if i wanted to leave my computer running for 52 >more hours it would've surely found Qg6 in the pv. > > >you can try it but i answered your question already so i hope this helps you. >Let me clear this up i let it sit for 26 hours fritz went to 19/50 ply it >would've taken atleast 1 more ply to find Qg6 maybe 2 but no more as at move 23 >it takes 16ply to find Qg6 , upto 15ply Qg4 is prefered ..... Qg6 is better If it takes 19 ply to find that one move is really the best move (e5 better than Nf3, for example), then it might take 19 ply to find out that Qg4 is better than Qg6, or it could be that you're right and Qg6 is really better. I'm not totally convinced that a simple computer search from that position can tell us the right answer, because both moves are probably winning, and it's obviously very deep.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.