Author: Alex Patterson
Date: 12:32:13 02/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2001 at 12:58:02, Uri Blass wrote:
>On February 11, 2001 at 12:45:07, Alex Patterson wrote:
>
>>On February 11, 2001 at 12:24:21, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>>
>>>in this position :
>>>
>>>[d]k7/p7/1p6/3p4/3K1B2/r7/8/4R3 w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 gives +2.14 for white , I think it's a big overevaluation for
>>>white !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>consequence : in this position
>>>
>>>[d]k7/p7/1p6/3p4/3K1p2/PP3r2/7B/4R3 b - - 0 1
>>>
>>>Tiger 1.0 wants to play Rf2??
>>
>>
>>So? Rf2! is the best move, and that is backed up by crafty, TCB, and HIARCS.
>>Anyway I dont see the problem with Rf2!.
>
>Rf2 is not the best move of Crafty18.1
>It prefers Rxb3 with evaluation of 0.00 at depth 15
>
>After Rf2 Crafty can see a clear advantage for white (1.54 pawns at depth 13 and
>1.68 at depth 14)
>The problem is that tiger does not know that rook and a bishop with no pawns
>usually cannot win.
>
>It is a known problem of tiger and it is not news.
I was using crafty 15.14 for that analysis.
-Alex
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.