Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:48:21 02/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2001 at 02:29:21, Pekka Karjalainen wrote: >On February 22, 2001 at 21:37:39, G. R. Morton wrote: > >>I agree. Evidence for this is the game of Go, and other Asian board games, which >>are combinatorially much more complex than Chess and much more difficult to >>program for (I heard an AI programmer give a lecture about this). It took much >>longer for Go programmers to begin to catch up with the human masters. I >>understand they have not caught up yet to the degree that Chess programers have. > > http://www.intelligentgo.org The claim that the number of players that are better than the computer in chess is precisely 0 only because of one match that kasparov lost against a computer is wrong. I do not want to read other things that they say after reading this wrong claim. They should learn statistics and know that result of 3.5-2.5 is not significant to decide which side is better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.