Author: Pekka Karjalainen
Date: 23:29:49 02/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2001 at 03:48:21, Uri Blass wrote: >> http://www.intelligentgo.org > >The claim that the number of players that are better than the computer in chess >is precisely 0 only because of one match that kasparov lost against a computer >is wrong. > >I do not want to read other things that they say after reading this wrong claim. You are right. That is complete nonsense and I have no idea why they have it in their page. When I read the pages I ignored the silly statement. I probably should e-mail them about it and see if anyone there cares to correct it. Thanks for pointing it out. > >They should learn statistics and know that result of 3.5-2.5 is not significant >to decide which side is better. They probably have little or no idea what really is going on in computer chess, or what happened in the 1997 match with Deep Blue. One hopes the situation is better regarding their own topic. > >Uri Pekka
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.