Author: Amicitia Stone
Date: 09:11:27 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 12:04:44, James T. Walker wrote: >On March 11, 2001 at 11:52:42, Amicitia Stone wrote: > >>On March 11, 2001 at 11:51:04, jonas cohonas wrote: >> >>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:49:37, Amicitia Stone wrote: >>> >>>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:46:26, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>:-) >>>> >>>>Maybe deep shredder wasn't out at the time this game started? >>> >>>Mabye it is because Deep Frtiz can run on one processor and Deep shredder can't? >> >>It can't? or it won't play as strong? I'm sure it can play under one processor. >>I'll stick with my response until we get the real answer :) >> >>Have a good one, > >I have Deep Shredder and it will play with one processor. I believe it is >almost identical to Shredder 5 with maybe some small changes to the endgame. If >that's true then it's not too late to switch to Deep Shredder with little or no >negative impact. >Jim I think you would see an out cry if they switched now. You say it is almost identical to Shredder 5 so I think they should be better safe then sorry and stick with Shredder 5. But you are right in that I also would like it see Deep Shredder play. Shredder 5 is however more than capable in these time controls to put up a good fight!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.