Author: James T. Walker
Date: 09:18:08 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 12:11:27, Amicitia Stone wrote: >On March 11, 2001 at 12:04:44, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On March 11, 2001 at 11:52:42, Amicitia Stone wrote: >> >>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:51:04, jonas cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:49:37, Amicitia Stone wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:46:26, James T. Walker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>:-) >>>>> >>>>>Maybe deep shredder wasn't out at the time this game started? >>>> >>>>Mabye it is because Deep Frtiz can run on one processor and Deep shredder can't? >>> >>>It can't? or it won't play as strong? I'm sure it can play under one processor. >>>I'll stick with my response until we get the real answer :) >>> >>>Have a good one, >> >>I have Deep Shredder and it will play with one processor. I believe it is >>almost identical to Shredder 5 with maybe some small changes to the endgame. If >>that's true then it's not too late to switch to Deep Shredder with little or no >>negative impact. >>Jim > >I think you would see an out cry if they switched now. You say it is almost >identical to Shredder 5 so I think they should be better safe then sorry and >stick with Shredder 5. But you are right in that I also would like it see Deep >Shredder play. Shredder 5 is however more than capable in these time controls to >put up a good fight! Well only SMK can for sure say what the difference is so sticking with the original Shredder 5 is best at this time I guess. So we will end up with one game of Deep Fritz vs Shredder 5 that is unadulterated. I'm sure that's best to keep the arguments at a minimum. :-) Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.