Author: James T. Walker
Date: 17:37:34 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 18:15:41, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On March 11, 2001 at 17:31:29, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On March 11, 2001 at 14:59:11, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On March 11, 2001 at 14:19:05, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On March 11, 2001 at 11:46:26, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>:-) >>>> >>>>Actually I had written a while back about whether like Deep Fritz >>>>Deep Shredder was better on a single processor. >>>> >>>>I think to my best recall Enrique wrote that was not the case. >>> >>>Did I? I think that on a single processor machine Deep Shredder may be a bit >>>better than Shredder 5, but nothing to write home about. >>> >>>Enrique >>> >>>>Andreas suggested the match-up of Deep Fritz v Shredder 5 so that >>>>was what we played. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >> >>When I first loaded Deep Shredder I ran some test (took all of 15 minutes). In >>a couple of middle game positions the depth/KNps/eval were almost exactly the >>same. In a couple of endgame positions the moves were different with different >>times and different evals so I suspect the endgame has been changed/improved >>slightlty. All this in 15 minutes! :-) >>Jim > >That's very good! :) > >Now try this with both and tell me which one sees first the Trojan horse in >action. > >[D]rnbq2k1/p1r2p1p/1p1p1Pp1/1BpPn1N1/P7/2P5/6PP/R1B1QRK1 w > >Enrique Hello Enrique, I'm afraid you'll have to explain that to me. Give me the winning move/line. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.