Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior)

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 21:49:55 03/28/01

Go up one level in this thread

On March 28, 2001 at 16:38:31, Rajen Gupta wrote:

>chinook ckeckers, (the checkers equivalent of deep blue)is ready to face all
>comers on its web site(admittedly a single processor version, but the same
>software)why cant deep blue or even deep blue junior do the same? is it because
>it is scared of being exposed for what it really is?
>
>rajen



Do you really think you are doing anything good for this forum by bringing this
issue once again?



    Christophe

• Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Fabio Lopez 06:35:07 03/29/01
  • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Robert Hyatt 07:41:33 03/29/01
    • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Ralf Elvsén 06:12:06 03/30/01
      • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Robert Hyatt 10:04:36 03/30/01
    • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Fabio Lopez 10:54:25 03/29/01
      • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Robert Hyatt 11:27:53 03/29/01
        • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Pete Galati 14:26:58 03/29/01
    • Re: if chinook can play why not deep blue(or junior) Christophe Theron 10:43:16 03/29/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.