Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Aufsess-tournament 98: Fritz5 comment

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 16:20:47 03/27/98

Go up one level in this thread


On March 27, 1998 at 18:08:04, Scott Carmichael wrote:

>   It's called an analogy, Thorsten. I really doubt if anyone but you
>missed that fact, but then again, you seem to believe that facts
>indicate nothing.

You have a problem understanding my point.
I have no problem to believe in facts.
The problem is:
You believe facts are OUT THERE and you could talk about them without
subjective or interpretating methods or without changing them.

Facts are not real !
Our whole life we try to find out about reality. And we only have our
brain and our senses. You cannot FIND OUT about the reality OUT THERE
without interpretation.

You cannot proof facts. Or reality.
We seem to have completely different ideas about the world. You seem to
live in a materialistic world where a big machine in the universe shows
1:1 the time, the ACCURATE move to win the game and the FACTS. And you
seem to believe WE could 1:1 (without subjectiveness and
MISinterpretation) understand these facts and the laws arround the
big-machine-in-universe.

I don't believe in your classical-mechanistical machine.
I don't believe in randomn and in causality. There is no law of
causality.
This is an AXIOM. But you cannot proof an axiom. And you cannot proof
the outer world WITHOUT using your brain.
Your brain is the hardware that runs the software that interprates the
outer world. But you cannot see or get this outer world 1:1.



>   This being the case, I think you should develop a new program that
>plays without any book, or tablebase, and uses no hashtables based on
>the the facts of best play. You can call it Prozac Jr., as it's sole
>useful purpose will be to hide you from the truth, and make you feel
>better when the real world pokes through.

Your sarcasm is wrong here.
In my opinion you are like a religious person believing in god.
Ok - you call your GOD= FACTS or EVIDENCE. So you use a different word
for it. But you believe in the same way in YOUR god like other people go
into a church.
I do NOT believe that FACTS and EVIDENCE is REAL. And I do not believe
that
GOD is real (as it is written in many holy books).

This is the reason I don't accept these GODS give me commands or control
my live.
It is YOUR decision that the commandments of your GOD=Materialism
give you orders and direct your life. Please accept that
I don't have your GODS and they do not drive me.

You can comment this sarcastically, but this will not change anything
towards the FACT that i do not follow your silly gods telling me that
you could "get" the outer world without using your subjective brain or
axioms out of it.

Look - the state of evidence that comes out of any logic is not the
reality itself. It is the interpretation of human brains or ideas that
were generated out of human brains.
I don't trust logics that has been proofed to be wrong (Goedel) and do
better trust feelings. Feelings are more 1:1 than any logic, especially
anything out of the aristotelic logic (x=a*(b+c)).

Please - feel free to believe in whatever you want.
I hope you understand my anology too.

I hope I did not use to much sarcasm myself. This is not my intention.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.