Author: Scott Carmichael
Date: 20:10:11 03/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
Hmm, yet another contradiction, this time within a two sentence span. In yuor defense, it is pleasing to learn that you can read. However, it is noteable that Renee Descartes was a mathematician, and we all know how much effect emotion has upon mathematicallty proven laws. It's is good to know that people such as yourself intend to stand up for the rights of the ignorant, It keeps those of us who are here to exchange real data and information alert to the fact that peopel like you are also here to mislead and spread misinformation. And you claimed that you couldn't play Clintons games. Ha!. How you live your life has no effect upon the results posted by SSDF, or by others here on CCC. However, believe this on a personal level: you do not possess the intellect, nor the ability to harm me, and your quasi-threat to do so only exposes you as a person whom should be regarded as a threat to legitimate study and learning here. Even at a SCHOLASTIC level of debate,. one must provide PROOF of assertions or be recognized as incompetent. You have been recognized. Enrique burst your bubble when he posted a message you had obviously sent some weeks before. Yet still you would argue with an expert on the subject, and show further ignorance. Empirical data collection is the essence of this debate, and you will remain isolated from the truth until such time as you seek therapy for your condition.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.