Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: This is discrimination of the worst kind

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 12:05:43 04/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 16, 2001 at 07:04:15, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On April 16, 2001 at 06:37:41, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>
>>On April 16, 2001 at 06:09:57, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>On April 16, 2001 at 06:01:34, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 16, 2001 at 05:33:47, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 15, 2001 at 18:44:06, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is some news about the upcoming event:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- We invited 4 programs: DB and the Deeps of Fritz, Shredder and Junior.
>>>>>>"We" is BGN and Enrique Irazoqui, with Bertil Eklund as consultant.
>>>>>
>>>>>A very nice couple. Both of them just recently called me a hypocrite
>>>>>in the CSS forum. My sin: reporting the Odyssey tournament. Reason:
>>>>>they dislike Thorsten Czub the organizer of Odyssey.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you mention this Ed?
>>>>>
>>>>>Because I am in this business too long. Personal dislikes have become
>>>>>the keyword expelling Rebel and Tiger.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>- DB is obvious. Fritz has been leading everything in computer chess,
>>>>>
>>>>>Only on SSDF.
>>>>>
>>>>>Which manual tournament Fritz has won the last 3 years?
>>>>>
>>>>>Answer: NONE.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>short of a Swiss open of 7 rounds that receives the name "world championship".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ridiculous...
>>>>>
>>>>>There are only 2 programs playing in this world championship.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Shredder is strong and got the 2 last titles, whatever they mean, although
>>>>>>it never topped the SSDF list, never won long tournaments. Junior is also
>>>>>>strong, was first in the SSDF list about a year ago, won some long
>>>>>>tournaments, achieved a PR of 2702 last year in Dortmund.
>>>>>
>>>>>Agreed, but then..........
>>>>>
>>>>>Tiger 12.0 coming from nothing topped the SSDF list. The new Tiger will
>>>>>top your list soon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>The rest is either
>>>>>>not strong enough or not SMP ready, which means they don't have a chance and
>>>>>>their inclusion would only increase randomness.
>>>>>
>>>>>What an utter nonsense is that. You and Enrique should know better than that.
>>>>>It is like Christophe said, all arranged behind the curtains, no way back.
>>>>>Discrimination of the worst kind.
>>>>>
>>>>>In no way it is proven that a multi-processor program is doing better than
>>>>>a single-processor program. Just look at the latest Ausfess tournament Tiger
>>>>>13.0 (not 14.0) topping above all the multi-processing entries:
>>>>>
>>>>>==================================================
>>>>>Tournament : Aufseß 2001
>>>>>Date : 13/03 to 17/03
>>>>>Type : 9 rounds Swiss
>>>>>Time control : 3h/all
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Chess-Tiger 13.0        Athlon 1,3 GHz	6.5	46.5 31.75
>>>>> 2. Hiarcs 7.32             Athlon 800		6.5 	46.0 32.75
>>>>> 3. CM 6555                 Athlon 1,2 GHz	6.0 	45.5 29.00
>>>>> 4. SOS 11/2000             Athlon 800		5.5 	44.5 26.25
>>>>> 5. Deep Fritz              2x P3 1 GHz		5.5 	43.5 26.00
>>>>> 6. Gandalf 4.32h           Athlon 1,2 GHz	5.5 	36.5 20.25
>>>>> 7. Hiarcs 7.01             Athlon 1,0		5.0 	45.0 24.00
>>>>> 8. Gambit-Tiger 1.0        P3-840 		5.0 	44.0 22.25
>>>>> 9. Shredder5 Erbsenzähler  P3-1000		5.0 	41.5 20.25
>>>>>10. Deep Shredder           2x P3-935           5.0	41.0 20.25
>>>>>11. Deep Junior             2x Athlon 1Ghz	5.0	40.5 18.50
>>>>>12. Century 3.0             P3-866		4.5	45.5 21.25
>>>>>13. Junior 6                Athlon 1,2 GHz	4.5	38.5 16.75
>>>>>14. Triple-Brain            2 x Celeron 500	4.0	36.5 13.25
>>>>>15. Shredder 5              Athlon 1,2 GHz	4.0	36.0 13.00
>>>>>16. Fritz 6                 P2-400		3.5	44.5 16.00
>>>>>17. The King 2.54           P4-1300		3.5	38.0 14.25
>>>>>18. Genius 6,5              P3-800		3.5	36.5 12.00
>>>>>19. Nimzo 8                 Athlon 1 GHz	3.0	36.0 10.75
>>>>>20. Goliath Light Exp.      Athlon 1,2		3.0	35.0 10.25
>>>>>21. M- Chess 7.1            P3-500		2.5	35.0  8.25
>>>>>22. CM 8000                 Athlon 1,2 GHz	2.5	35.0  8.00
>>>>>====================================
>>>>>
>>>>>The URL: www.rebel.nl/r11-resu.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>For once have a look at this complete victory list and tell me which program
>>>>>has won so much tournaments? Answer: ONLY Chess Tiger! And you want to expel
>>>>>this program???
>>>>>
>>>>>Another example is Paderborn 1999 the world championship all classes
>>>>>Shredder winning the tournament on a poor Pentium 550 above all the
>>>>>multi-processor entries:
>>>>>
>>>>>. Junior 4 x 500 Mhz
>>>>>. Fritz 4 x 500 Mhz
>>>>>. Ferret 4 x 400 Mhz
>>>>>. Cilkchess 240 x Alpha at 250 Mhz
>>>>>. P.ConNerS 186 x PII 450 Mhz
>>>>>. Zugzwang 512 x Alpha at 300 Mhz
>>>>>
>>>>>Bertil, you called me a hyprocrite in the CSS forum. Here on CCC you accused
>>>>>me of a campaigning against the SSDF. In email I asked you why I deserved
>>>>>such a public insult. You have ignored the email.
>>>>>
>>>>>It smells Bertil. And all of this because I am reporting Odyssey? I find
>>>>>this very very hard to believe.
>>>>>
>>>>>Furthermore I have seen the SSDF tester Lykke proudly announcing here on CCC
>>>>>his Deep Fritz - Deep Shredder game listed on the ChessBase site all well
>>>>>nicely documented with pictures, a clear case of an endorsement.
>>>>
>>>>Please, Ed. Are you paranoid.
>>>
>>>Thank you. I will add this one to my growing list.
>>>
>>>
>>>>A have nothing running with Chessbase. They contacted me, and ask friendly if
>>>>the might publice the game Shredder-Deep Fritz 2hours/move.
>>>
>>>That is the point, you should have said NO.
>>>
>>>You are not in the position to say yes.
>>
>>I think there is only ONE to decide this, and that is not you ;-)
>
>Of course, it is a free world.
>
>
>>I´m planning sometimes in the future to play a simular game between on of your
>>companys programs and another program.
>
>Feel free to do so.
>
>
>>If you ask me if you can publish the game and data on your website, should I
>>then say no.
>>Ofcourse not.
>
>But I won't ask.
>
>If you do not understand what this is all about and the meaning of the
>word endorsement (freely translated as connection) I can not help.
>
>Same as Bertil should not have joined the BGN organisation. You are the SSDF
>claiming independency. You guys are not aware of your status.
>
>Ed

I do not see it in the same way that you see it.
Hans Christian Lykke is independent tester.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.