Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Larry Kaufman's "Solutions" in CCR Test

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 14:09:48 05/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 03, 2001 at 16:07:36, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On May 03, 2001 at 15:58:49, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>>On May 03, 2001 at 15:47:11, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On May 03, 2001 at 15:45:18, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 03, 2001 at 15:22:04, Paul wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 03, 2001 at 15:01:47, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>On May 03, 2001 at 14:33:28, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  I checked out a few of the "solutions" given in the One Hour CCR Test with
>>>>>>>>Nunn's Chess Openings (I was building an opening book with MCO14 but found so
>>>>>>>>many errors I gave up) and have not found one yet that is "incorrect."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  #5 Solution 5...e5 NCO suggests that "with counterplay."
>>>>>
>>>>>>If I enable comet's book, it wants to play e6 here. So, this seems to be an
>>>>>>alternative.
>>>>
>>>>I guess, it's not quite clear here. The ChessBase books strongly suggest ... e5
>>>>in this position.
>>>>A database search reveals that ... e6 had been played more often, but with very
>>>>little success for black. e5 had not been played so often, its success is very
>>>>poor, too. Perhaps this line isn't too good for black.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Great ... that's what mine wants to play: e5 for 1 second, e6 from then on ...
>>>>>ok, 4 more points, thanks! ;)
>>>>
>>>>Yes, I guess that we should allow here ... e6 too.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>For Comet this doesn't make much difference, 3 points already right? You've
>>>>>really got a great score on this test!
>>>>
>>>>I already expexted it. A couple of years ago on 486 hardware, I had made this
>>>>test occasionally and comet had scored already as well as the commercials. Thus,
>>>>on today's hardware, it could only be far better (provided I hadn't spoilt too
>>>>much meanwhile).
>>>
>>>Could someone be so kind as to post the EPD for the positions in question?
>>>Also, the suggested moves and possible alternatives would be nice.
>>
>>This is what I have been using:
>>
>>rn1qkb1r/pp2pppp/5n2/3p1b2/3P4/2N1P3/PP3PPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - bm Qb3; id
>>"CCR.01";
>>rn1qkb1r/pp2pppp/5n2/3p1b2/3P4/1QN1P3/PP3PPP/R1B1KBNR b KQkq - bm Bc8; id
>>"CCR.02";
>>r1bqk2r/ppp2ppp/2n5/4P3/2Bp2n1/5N1P/PP1N1PP1/R2Q1RK1 b kq - bm Nh6; id "CCR.03";
>>r1bqrnk1/pp2bp1p/2p2np1/3p2B1/3P4/2NBPN2/PPQ2PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm b4; id
>>"CCR.04";
>>rnbqkb1r/ppp1pppp/5n2/8/3PP3/2N5/PP3PPP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm e5; id "CCR.05";
>>rnbq1rk1/pppp1ppp/4pn2/8/1bPP4/P1N5/1PQ1PPPP/R1B1KBNR b KQ - bm Bxc3+; id
>>"CCR.06";
>>r4rk1/3nppbp/bq1p1np1/2pP4/8/2N2NPP/PP2PPB1/R1BQR1K1 b - - bm Rfb8; id "CCR.07";
>>rn1qkb1r/pb1p1ppp/1p2pn2/2p5/2PP4/5NP1/PP2PPBP/RNBQK2R w KQkq - bm d5; id
>>"CCR.08";
>>r1bq1rk1/1pp2pbp/p1np1np1/3Pp3/2P1P3/2N1BP2/PP4PP/R1NQKB1R b KQ - bm Nd4; id
>>"CCR.09";
>>rnbqr1k1/1p3pbp/p2p1np1/2pP4/4P3/2N5/PP1NBPPP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - bm a4; id "CCR.10";
>>rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/5n2/4p3/4PP2/2N5/PPPP2PP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm d5; id "CCR.11";
>>r1bqk1nr/pppnbppp/3p4/8/2BNP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQK2R w KQkq - bm Bxf7+; id "CCR.12";
>>rnbq1b1r/ppp2kpp/3p1n2/8/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKB1R b KQ - am Nxe4; id "CCR.13";
>>rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/3n4/8/2BQ4/5N2/PPP2PPP/RNB2RK1 b kq - am Nxc4; id "CCR.14";
>>r2q1rk1/2p1bppp/p2p1n2/1p2P3/4P1b1/1nP1BN2/PP3PPP/RN1QR1K1 w - - bm exf6; id
>>"CCR.15";
>>r1bqkb1r/2pp1ppp/p1n5/1p2p3/3Pn3/1B3N2/PPP2PPP/RNBQ1RK1 b kq - bm d5; id
>>"CCR.16";
>>r2qkbnr/2p2pp1/p1pp4/4p2p/4P1b1/5N1P/PPPP1PP1/RNBQ1RK1 w kq - am hxg4; id
>>"CCR.17";
>>r1bqkb1r/pp3ppp/2np1n2/4p1B1/3NP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R2QKB1R w KQkq - bm Bxf6; id
>>"CCR.18";
>>rn1qk2r/1b2bppp/p2ppn2/1p6/3NP3/1BN5/PPP2PPP/R1BQR1K1 w kq - bm Bxe6; id
>>"CCR.19";
>>r1b1kb1r/1pqpnppp/p1n1p3/8/3NP3/2N1B3/PPP1BPPP/R2QK2R w KQkq - bm Nd4-b5; id
>>"CCR.20";
>>r1bqnr2/pp1ppkbp/4N1p1/n3P3/8/2N1B3/PPP2PPP/R2QK2R b KQ - am Ke6; id "CCR.21";
>>r3kb1r/pp1b1ppp/1q2pn2/n2p4/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PPQ2PPP/RN2K2R w KQkq - bm a4; id
>>"CCR.22";
>>r1bq1rk1/pppnnppp/4p3/3pP3/1b1P4/2NB3N/PPP2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQ - bm Bxh7+; id
>>"CCR.23";
>>r2qkbnr/ppp1pp1p/3p2p1/3Pn3/4P1b1/2N2N2/PPP2PPP/R1BQKB1R w KQkq - bm Nxe5; id
>>"CCR.24";
>>rn2kb1r/pp2pppp/1qP2n2/8/6b1/1Q6/PP1PPPBP/RNB1K1NR b KQkq - am Qxb3; id
>>"CCR.25";
>
>Besides the missing clock stuff (which probably won't play a role anyway, since
>all the clocks are early) I notice that all the ep squares are missing from this
>set.  I have not looked to see if any of the ep pawns are vulnerable.  Does
>anyone know for sure?

Hadn't noticed. "Paul" has posted a link to a better set above...

Andrew




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.